Futures

Micro vs Standard Futures Calculator

Same market, same chart, one tenth the multiplier. Enter your risk and stop to see which contract lets you size to your rule instead of past it.

Your trade

The two contracts

ES 50 · NQ 20 · YM 5 · RTY 50.
MES 5 · MNQ 2 · MYM 0.5 · M2K 5.
Micro contracts you can take
Standard contracts you can take
Risk per standard contract
Risk per micro contract
Budget wasted on standards
Budget wasted on micros

Same market, same chart, same tick size — only the multiplier differs, usually by a factor of ten. Micros are not a lesser instrument; they are the same instrument with a finer step, and the finer step is what lets a small account size to its rule instead of rounding past it.

FreeNo signupNothing leaves your browser

The only difference is the multiplier

Standard Micro Ratio
S&P 500 ES — $50 MES — $5 10×
Nasdaq 100 NQ — $20 MNQ — $2 10×
Dow YM — $5 MYM — $0.50 10×
Russell 2000 RTY — $50 M2K — $5 10×

Same underlying index, same trading hours, same tick size, same chart. Only the multiplier differs, and on the major index contracts it differs by exactly ten.

That last point is where the errors come from: because the tick is identical, everything looks the same on screen while every tick is worth ten times more or less.

What the micro actually buys you

Not lower risk. Ten micros carry exactly the same exposure as one standard, and nobody is safer for holding them.

What it buys is granularity. With a 10-point stop:

  • ES risks $500 per contract, so a $250 budget buys zero and a $900 budget buys one, leaving $400 unused.
  • MES risks $50 per contract, so $250 buys five and $900 buys eighteen, leaving nothing unused in either case.

The full-size contract forces a small account to choose between too much and nothing. That is the problem micros solve, and it is a sizing problem rather than a risk-appetite one.

The calculator shows wasted budget for both, because that gap is the whole decision.

The cost that runs the other way

Fees are charged per contract, and they do not shrink with the multiplier.

Ten micros pay ten commissions where one standard pays one. If a round trip is $4.50, ten micros cost $45 against $4.50 for the equivalent standard position — the same exposure at ten times the cost. On MES that is 0.9 points of hurdle per contract, against 0.09 on ES.

So the honest rule is: use micros while the granularity matters, and move to standards once your position size makes the fee ratio the bigger problem. The crossover is usually somewhere around the point where you would routinely be trading eight or ten micros.

The switch that catches people

Moving from micros to standards is where accounts get hurt, and the mechanism is mundane.

A trader spends months on MES thinking in $1.25 ticks and $5 points. They switch to ES. The chart is identical, the ladder is identical, the stop is placed at the same distance — and every number is now ten times larger. A normal day becomes a very large day in whichever direction it was going.

The defence is to recalculate size on the day of the switch rather than transfer the habit, which is exactly what the position size calculator is for.

FAQ

What is the difference between ES and MES?

Only the contract multiplier: $50 a point against $5. Same index, same tick size of 0.25, same hours. One ES equals ten MES in exposure.

Are micro futures safer?

No. Risk is position size multiplied by stop distance, and ten micros equal one standard exactly. What micros provide is a smaller step, which lets a small account size to its rule rather than round past it.

Do micros cost more in fees?

Per unit of exposure, yes. Fees are per contract, so ten micros pay ten commissions against one for the equivalent standard. That is the trade-off against finer sizing, and it becomes the dominant cost once you are trading many of them.

When should I move from micros to standards?

Roughly when you would consistently trade eight or ten micros, since at that point the fee difference outweighs the granularity benefit. Recalculate your position size on the day you switch instead of carrying over the sizing habit.

Is liquidity worse on micros?

It is thinner than the full-size contracts but deep enough for retail size on the major index micros, which trade very actively. The spread is normally the same single tick, so the practical difference for a few contracts is small.

This is the plan. What did you actually do?

A calculator tells you the size you should have taken. It cannot tell you the size you took at 2pm after two losers, or how often your stop moved once price went against you. Drop in a statement from MT4/MT5, a broker CSV or a crypto export and see the answer for your own last 90 trades.

Import my trades — free