The calculation
risk per contract = |entry − stop| × multiplier
contracts = floor( (equity × risk%) ÷ risk per contract )
A $25,000 account risking 1% has $250. An ES trade with a 10-point stop risks 10 × 50 = $500 per contract — so the answer is zero contracts, and that is a correct answer rather than a broken one.
Rounding down is the rule, and it costs something
Contracts are indivisible. The calculation returns 2.7 and you take 2, so the risk actually taken is below target rather than above it.
That direction is deliberate and non-negotiable: rounding up to reach the intended figure breaks the only rule the calculation exists to enforce. It feels like a rounding error and it is a risk-rule violation on every trade it happens.
What it costs is visible in the unused budget row. Two contracts of a $180 risk against a $500 allowance uses $360 and leaves $140 — 28% of the allowance doing nothing. On a large account with a wide stop this is negligible. On a small account with full-size contracts it is routinely a third or more, and that waste is the real argument for micros rather than any claim about them being safer.
When the answer is zero
It happens often on small accounts, and the honest responses are limited:
- Trade the micro. A tenth of the multiplier turns $500 of risk per contract into $50, which fits. This is what micros are for and it changes nothing about the trade itself.
- Take the trade at a wider risk percentage — a decision to be made deliberately, once, not silently per trade.
- Skip it. A stop that is too wide for the account is information, not an obstacle.
The answer that is not available is tightening the stop until the size fits. That moves the exit to where the arithmetic is comfortable rather than where the idea is wrong, and it converts a sizing constraint into a losing strategy.
On a funded or evaluation account
The percentage rule is not the binding constraint here — the firm's daily loss limit is, and it is a hard boundary rather than a preference.
The useful version of this calculation on a prop account is contracts against remaining room today, not against account equity. Those are different numbers on any day that has already had a loss, and the second is the one that ends the account. The prop drawdown calculator works out the room; this page turns it into contracts.