Forex and CFD

Fibonacci Calculator

Enter the swing and the direction to get the retracement levels and the extensions beyond them — with an honest note about which of them is not a Fibonacci number.

The swing you are measuring

61.8% retracement
23.6% retracement
38.2% retracement
50% retracement
78.6% retracement
127.2% extension
161.8% extension

The 50% level is not a Fibonacci ratio at all — it is included by convention because price frequently retraces about half a move. Keeping it on the list and knowing it is a different kind of number is more honest than quietly presenting it as part of the sequence.

FreeNo signupNothing leaves your browser

The levels

Measure a swing from low to high, then mark the fractions of it where price might pull back:

uptrend:   level = high − (high − low) × ratio
downtrend: level = low  + (high − low) × ratio
Ratio Where it comes from
23.6% Fibonacci sequence
38.2% Fibonacci sequence
50% not Fibonacci — convention
61.8% the golden ratio
78.6% square root of 61.8%

Extensions project beyond the swing: 127.2% and 161.8% are the two in common use as targets.

The 50% level, stated plainly

It is not a Fibonacci ratio. It is not in the sequence, it is not derived from the golden ratio, and it is on virtually every chart.

It is there because price frequently retraces about half of a move, which was observed long before anyone attached Fibonacci to charts — Dow theory describes the same tendency. It survives because it is often the most useful line on the drawing.

Presenting it silently among the real ratios implies a mathematical pedigree it does not have. It is more honest, and more useful, to know that one of the five lines is a rule of thumb wearing the same clothes as the other four.

What these levels actually are

There is no mechanism by which the golden ratio governs markets. What exists is a very large number of traders drawing the same tool between roughly the same two points, and placing orders at the resulting lines.

That makes Fibonacci levels a coordination device: they work to the extent that they are widely watched, in the same way pivot points do. It is a real effect and a modest one, and it decays wherever the swing being measured is ambiguous.

Which is often. The tool requires choosing a high and a low, and reasonable people choose differently — a different timeframe, a different wick, a different starting swing. Levels drawn from a different swing are different levels, and this is why Fibonacci analysis looks so persuasive in hindsight: with several plausible swings, some line always sits near the turn.

Using them without fooling yourself

Three habits make the difference:

  • Choose the swing before the outcome. Draw it on the most recent obvious high and low, and do not redraw it because price ignored the first attempt.
  • Use levels as places, not as signals. A level is somewhere to look for a reason to act, not the reason itself.
  • Put the stop beyond the structure, not beyond the level. A stop just past 61.8% is where every other Fibonacci trader also put theirs, which makes it a liquidity pool rather than protection.

FAQ

What are the main Fibonacci retracement levels?

23.6%, 38.2%, 50%, 61.8% and 78.6%. All except 50% derive from the Fibonacci sequence or the golden ratio; 50% is included by convention because price often retraces about half a move.

Why is 61.8% considered the most important?

It is the golden ratio, the limit of the Fibonacci sequence ratios, and it is the level most traders watch. Its significance is a matter of shared attention rather than any market mechanism.

How do I use Fibonacci extensions?

Project beyond the swing to set targets: 127.2% and 161.8% are the common ones. On an upward swing they sit above the high, giving a target if price breaks past the original move.

Should I draw from wick to wick or body to body?

Both are in use and neither is correct. Wick to wick is the more common convention. What matters more is picking one and staying with it, since switching lets you find a level near any turn after the fact.

Do Fibonacci levels work?

They function as reference points because many participants draw them, in the same way pivots do. The main hazard is that the swing is chosen by the analyst, so with several plausible swings some level always appears to have worked in hindsight.

This is the plan. What did you actually do?

A calculator tells you the size you should have taken. It cannot tell you the size you took at 2pm after two losers, or how often your stop moved once price went against you. Drop in a statement from MT4/MT5, a broker CSV or a crypto export and see the answer for your own last 90 trades.

Import my trades — free