The ratios
P/E = price ÷ earnings per share
earnings yield = EPS ÷ price (the P/E inverted)
forward P/E = price ÷ expected EPS
PEG = P/E ÷ earnings growth rate
A $52.40 share with $3.40 of trailing earnings has a P/E of 15.4 — you pay 15.4 years of current earnings for the share — and an earnings yield of 6.5%.
Inverting it is what makes it comparable
A P/E of 15 means nothing next to a bond, a savings rate or a rental property. 6.5% compares to all three immediately.
That is the practical use of the earnings yield, and it is why it sits high on this page rather than as a footnote. When cash pays 5%, a stock at a 6.5% earnings yield is offering 1.5 points of extra return for equity risk. When cash paid 0.5%, the same share at the same price was offering six points. The share did not change; the alternative did — which is most of the reason valuation multiples across the market rise and fall with interest rates.
PEG, and its honest limits
A high P/E is not expensive if the earnings are growing quickly. PEG divides one by the other:
| PEG | Conventional reading |
|---|---|
| Under 1 | Growth is cheap relative to the price |
| Around 1 | Fairly priced for its growth |
| Above 2 | The price requires the growth to continue and then some |
Two cautions. The growth rate is a forecast, usually an analyst consensus, and consensus forecasts are systematically optimistic — so PEG inherits an error it does not display. And the ratio breaks down at the extremes: a company growing 2% a year gets a flattering PEG from a very low P/E, which says more about the arithmetic than the business.
What a P/E cannot see
It compares price to a single year of accounting profit. It does not know about:
- Debt. Two companies with the same P/E and very different balance sheets are not equally priced. Enterprise value multiples exist for this reason.
- The quality of the earnings. One-off gains, asset sales and accounting choices all land in EPS.
- Whether the earnings repeat. A cyclical company at the top of its cycle shows its lowest P/E precisely when it is most expensive, because the denominator is at a peak that is about to fall.
That last one inverts the usual intuition and is worth remembering: for cyclicals, a low P/E is often a warning rather than a bargain.