Crypto

Grid Trading Calculator

A grid earns a small amount many times, so the fee is not a detail — it is the competitor. Enter the range to see what is left after it.

The range

Capital and costs

Every grid fill pays this twice — once to buy, once to sell.
Profit per completed grid
Grid step
Step as a percentage
Capital per grid
Fees as a share of each grid profit
If every grid completes once

A grid earns while price oscillates inside the range and holds an increasingly large position as price leaves the bottom of it. The profit figures assume completed round trips; the risk is the position you are left holding when price exits below the lower bound and stops coming back.

FreeNo signupNothing leaves your browser

How the arithmetic works

grid step        = (upper − lower) ÷ number of grids
profit per grid  = (step ÷ lower) × capital per grid − fees on both sides

A range of $55,000 to $70,000 split into 20 grids gives a step of $750 — about 1.36% at the bottom of the range. With $5,000 allocated, each grid holds $250, so a completed round trip earns roughly $3.41 gross.

Then the fees. At 0.05% per side, each round trip costs $0.25 — 7% of the gross. That ratio is the number this page is built around.

More grids is not more profit

The instinct is to add grids: narrower steps, more fills, more profit. The arithmetic disagrees.

Halving the step halves the profit per fill, while the fee per fill stays exactly the same. Fees are charged per transaction, not per percentage moved.

Grids in the range Step Gross per grid Fee share
10 2.7% larger small
20 1.36% half of that double
50 0.55% a fifth five times
100 0.27% a tenth ten times

Past a certain density the exchange earns more from the strategy than the trader does. The calculator warns when fees exceed 30% of a completed grid and stops the configuration outright when they exceed the profit entirely — which is easier to reach than it sounds on a standard fee tier.

This is also why grid bots are advertised alongside fee discounts and VIP tiers: the fee tier, not the range, is usually what decides whether the strategy is viable.

The risk the profit figures do not show

Every number here assumes completed round trips — bought at one level, sold at the next.

What actually accumulates when the price falls through the range is a position. Each buy fills, no sell follows, and by the lower bound the entire allocated capital is held as an asset bought on the way down. If the price then exits below the range and does not come back, the grid has not lost a few fills; it is holding a full position at an average price above the market.

That is the real risk profile: many small gains while price oscillates, one large open loss when it trends. The same shape as averaging down, running automatically.

The defence is the same as it always is — the capital allocated to the grid is the amount you are prepared to hold at the bottom of the range, not a working balance.

FAQ

How do I calculate grid trading profit?

Divide the range by the number of grids to get the step, express that as a percentage of the lower bound, and apply it to the capital allocated per grid. Subtract the fee for both sides of each round trip.

How many grids should I use?

Enough that the step comfortably exceeds twice the fee percentage, and no more. Narrower grids trade more often and hand a larger share of each result to the exchange, with no increase in the total the range can produce.

What happens if the price leaves the range?

Above the upper bound the grid stops trading and you hold cash, having sold everything on the way up. Below the lower bound you hold the full position, bought progressively during the decline, and nothing further fills.

Is grid trading profitable?

It is profitable in a range and loses in a trend, which is a description rather than a verdict. The two things that decide it in practice are the fee tier and whether the range chosen actually holds.

Is a grid the same as a martingale?

Not identical, but related — both add on the way down. A standard grid adds a constant amount per level rather than a multiplying one, so the exposure grows linearly rather than geometrically. The failure mode is the same shape, arriving more slowly.

This is the plan. What did you actually do?

A calculator tells you the size you should have taken. It cannot tell you the size you took at 2pm after two losers, or how often your stop moved once price went against you. Drop in a statement from MT4/MT5, a broker CSV or a crypto export and see the answer for your own last 90 trades.

Import my trades — free